THE MACHINE IS USING US (2007) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g
A VISION OF STUDENTS TODAY (2007) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGCJ46vyR9o
U.S. PROFESSOR OF THE YEAR AWARD (2008) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBmDgMFAZTI
CROWDSOURCING, TED TALK, VON AHN, CAPTCHA, DUO LINGO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ht4qiDRZE8
ARTFULLY VISIONING OUR HUMANITY, TED TALK, AARON KOBLIN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v4XxlfVk3o
AARON KOBLIN WEBSITE: http://www.aaronkoblin.com/work.html
www.JohnnyCashProject.com
EPIC 2015 (SHORT HISTORY OF THE WEB) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQDBhg60UNI
2020 VISION, KARL FISCH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcL7e39jpIo
DID YOU KNOW 2.0 (DEMOGRAPHIC STATS) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U
DID YOU KNOW 4.0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ILQrUrEWe8
STUDENTS TODAY 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-zhQjkNvmo#t=12
WESCH ANALYZING YOUTUBE FROM ANTHROPOLOGICAL POV (digital ethnography) WITH LOTS OF CLIPS FROM EARLY YOUTUBERS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPAO-lZ4_hU
A VISION OF STUDENTS TODAY (2007) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGCJ46vyR9o
U.S. PROFESSOR OF THE YEAR AWARD (2008) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBmDgMFAZTI
CROWDSOURCING, TED TALK, VON AHN, CAPTCHA, DUO LINGO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ht4qiDRZE8
ARTFULLY VISIONING OUR HUMANITY, TED TALK, AARON KOBLIN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v4XxlfVk3o
AARON KOBLIN WEBSITE: http://www.aaronkoblin.com/work.html
www.JohnnyCashProject.com
EPIC 2015 (SHORT HISTORY OF THE WEB) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQDBhg60UNI
2020 VISION, KARL FISCH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcL7e39jpIo
DID YOU KNOW 2.0 (DEMOGRAPHIC STATS) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U
DID YOU KNOW 4.0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ILQrUrEWe8
STUDENTS TODAY 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-zhQjkNvmo#t=12
WESCH ANALYZING YOUTUBE FROM ANTHROPOLOGICAL POV (digital ethnography) WITH LOTS OF CLIPS FROM EARLY YOUTUBERS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPAO-lZ4_hU
Re: Is Wikipedia for sale?
by D.I. von Briesen - Wednesday, 11 February 2015, 12:18 PM
| ||||
| Wes- it's a legitimate concern. You can learn a lot about a topic both by reading the wikipedia article AND reading the "talk" page (see the tab at the top of each article) BEHIND the article. This is a bit like reading the comments in a youtube video- if the comments are disabled, beware, and probably just don't even watch. It means those who put it out don't want to be questioned or discussed. If there are comments there, as much as they may be wacky or out there, there's much to be learned by those that make sense. If you take some controversial topic on wikipedia, like the wall that the israelis have built between the occupied west bank (well actually, well into it), and israel proper, you get this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ The Israelis want to call it a fence. The Palestinians want to call it a wall. Wikipedia originally compromised by calling it a "separation barrier" - you can see the current name as it is. Here's the talk page for that article: http://en.wikipedia. Just skim it, but read a few posts in detail and you'll see how complex (and interesting) this can get. Many people work to subvert the idea behind wikipedia, and many others champion it, and there's even evidence that wikipedia editors are by and large men- but my experience (and that of the web, if you believe the data) is that it's still one of the most useful go-to sites out there. I've started articles, had them deleted, and had others threatened for deletion, and along with this class, made many edits over the years- don't like it? Fix it. Here's a list of the kinds of shenanigans that have gone on:Appalachian's MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "en.wikipedia.org" claiming to be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Lest you be concerned that wikipedia is not trustworthy, consider the venerable textbooks you get in college. I know textbook writers and editors- they're human, and they make mistakes as well. Just look at the errata publisher will have to put out later... d.i. GIRLS AND CODING:
|
No comments:
Post a Comment